In an attempt to engage students and boost teacher morale, districts have resorted to various strategies. But the one that seems most promising has been around since 1980 and yet curiously has received little attention: the four-day school week (“Are Four-Day Weeks Bad for Students?” National Education Policy Center, Sep. 4).
Although the practice was originally adopted to save money, it not only improved the morale of teachers but most importantly showed a positive relationship on the percentage of students scoring at the proficient or advanced levels on math and reading achievement tests. The latter may be because the non-required fifth day was devoted to tutoring and enrichment. But it may also be because students need a break from the lockstep five-day school week.
I wonder if student performance might be greatly improved if schools were operated year-round but with more frequent breaks. Rather than the traditional two-month summer vacation, why not distribute two-week breaks throughout the entire calendar year? That would avoid the exhaustion experienced by students and teachers under the existing school calendar. Businesses in Sweden, New Zealand and other countries have experimented with four-day workweeks and have reported promising results in the form of happier, healthier and more productive workers.
(To post a comment, click on the title of this blog.)